Login
Hoofd menu
Selecteer WPM
Drie. Twee. Een. GO! Self-leadership: How good are you in leading yourself? Geschreven door Lars Tummers. When most people think of leaders, they think of famous people like Martin Luther King, John F. Kennedy, or (when talking about toxic leaders), Adolf Hitler. But why not think about ourselves in term of a leader? Academics and professionals interested in ‘self-leadership’ chose this path. Self-leadership literature can provide important lessons for professionals. Self-leadership has been shown to result in greater career success, more job satisfaction and less stress.[1] Read this blog to analyze your own self-leadership skills. The three self-leadership strategies The founding father of self-leadership, Charles Manz, defines self-leadership as “leading oneself toward performance of naturally motivating tasks as well as managing oneself to do work that must be done but is not naturally motivating” (p. 589)[2]. Building upon Manz, many researchers on self-leadership distinguish between three self-leadership strategies: behavior-focused, natural rewards and constructive thought patterns.[1] 1. Behavior-focused strategies. These strategies look at how you can complete unpleasant, but necessary, tasks. Sometimes, you just have to read a boring report or prepare a presentation on a topic you hate. One strategy to complete such tasks is to set specific goals and to reward yourself when you achieve them. Self-goal setting is related to the famous goal-setting theory of Locke and Latham. An overview of 35 years on goal-setting research shows that setting challenging and specific goals increases performance.[3] Furthermore, rewarding yourself – for instance with a vacation or even a good cup of coffee – can stimulate desired behavior.[4] 2. Natural rewards. Although self-leadership scholars recognize that external rewards can be beneficial, they emphasize that natural, intrinsic, rewards are often more effective. Some children are naturally interested in learning. You shouldn’t reward them for making their homework; this might even decrease their motivation. Self-leadership emphasizes that people should search for activities which they naturally enjoy. It goes beyond mere self-management by challenging people to be reflective about the work they do and the goals they have. What do you enjoy most? How can you adjust your job by giving joyful activities a greater share of the your workday? 3. Constructive thought patterns. This last self-leadership strategy is also about being reflective. It focuses on your thought patterns. Are you negative about your own performance potential? A constructive thought pattern reflects on this, replacing negative thoughts by positive self-talk. This includes envisioning yourself successfully performing a challenging task (mental imaginary). In an overview article it was found that mental imaginary positively influences performance.[4] When you for instance have to present for a difficult audience, you should imagine how you give a fantastic speech, how the audience will react and how you will feel afterwards. How good are you in leading yourself? In sum, self-leadership theory can provide you with hints on how to increase your productivity. Possibly even more important, it could help you to reflect on your own work and life goals. ----- Want to test your self-leadership skills directly (2 minute test, free of charge), see http://larstummers.com/self-leadership-good-leading/This Blog for ‘lerende leiders’ is also published on Frontiers References[1] Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 185-222.[2] Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review,11(3), 585-600.[3] Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year Odyssey. American Psychologist,57(9), 705.[4] Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 481.[5] Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672-691. .Discusieer mee over dit blog of deel het op social media

Lars Tummers
Geschreven door Lars Tummers. Geplaatst op 23-02-2014.
Hot 4163 treffers 0 favorieten toegevoegd

leading yourself, verbinding, inspiratie, dienend leiderschap, servant leadership, persoonlijke ontwikkeling, situationeel leiderschap, leiderschap, training, leiderschapsstijlen,persoonlijke effectiviteit, Jezelf Leiden,

When most people think of leaders, they think of famous people like Martin Luther King, John F. Kennedy, or (when talking about toxic leaders), Adolf Hitler. But why not think about ourselves in term of a leader? Academics and professionals interested in ‘self-leadership’ chose this path. Self-leadership literature can provide important lessons for professionals. Self-leadership has been shown to result in greater career success, more job satisfaction and less stress.[1] Read this blog to analyze your own self-leadership skills.

The three self-leadership strategies

The founding father of self-leadership, Charles Manz, defines self-leadership as “leading oneself toward performance of naturally motivating tasks as well as managing oneself to do work that must be done but is not naturally motivating” (p. 589)[2]. Building upon Manz, many researchers on self-leadership distinguish between three self-leadership strategies: behavior-focused, natural rewards and constructive thought patterns.[1]

1. Behavior-focused strategies.

These strategies look at how you can complete unpleasant, but necessary, tasks. Sometimes, you just have to read a boring report or prepare a presentation on a topic you hate. One strategy to complete such tasks is to set specific goals and to reward yourself when you achieve them. Self-goal setting is related to the famous goal-setting theory of Locke and Latham. An overview of 35 years on goal-setting research shows that setting challenging and specific goals increases performance.[3] Furthermore, rewarding yourself – for instance with a vacation or even a good cup of coffee – can stimulate desired behavior.[4]

2. Natural rewards.

Although self-leadership scholars recognize that external rewards can be beneficial, they emphasize that natural, intrinsic, rewards are often more effective. Some children are naturally interested in learning. You shouldn’t reward them for making their homework; this might even decrease their motivation. Self-leadership emphasizes that people should search for activities which they naturally enjoy. It goes beyond mere self-management by challenging people to be reflective about the work they do and the goals they have. What do you enjoy most? How can you adjust your job by giving joyful activities a greater share of the your workday?

3. Constructive thought patterns.

This last self-leadership strategy is also about being reflective. It focuses on your thought patterns. Are you negative about your own performance potential? A constructive thought pattern reflects on this, replacing negative thoughts by positive self-talk. This includes envisioning yourself successfully performing a challenging task (mental imaginary). In an overview article it was found that mental imaginary positively influences performance.[4] When you for instance have to present for a difficult audience, you should imagine how you give a fantastic speech, how the audience will react and how you will feel afterwards.

How good are you in leading yourself?

In sum, self-leadership theory can provide you with hints on how to increase your productivity. Possibly even more important, it could help you to reflect on your own work and life goals.

-----

Want to test your self-leadership skills directly (2 minute test, free of charge), see http://larstummers.com/self-leadership-good-leading/
This Blog for ‘lerende leiders’ is also published on Frontiers

References
[1] Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 185-222.
[2] Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review,11(3), 585-600.
[3] Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year Odyssey. American Psychologist,57(9), 705.
[4] Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 481.
[5] Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672-691.


Lars Tummers

Auteur: Lars Tummers

1 1325 2

Dr. Lars Tummers is universitair docent op de Eramus Universiteit Rotterdam en Visiting Scholar aan de University of California, Berkeley (V.S.). In zijn onderzoek richt hij zich op leiderschap, innovatie en het invoeren van beleid. Hij promoveerde 'cum laude' op een proefschrift over de problemen van professionals met nieuw beleid (beleidsvervreemding). In 2013 ontving hij de Onderzoeksprijs van de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam. www.larstummers.com


Wat vind jij? deel het met ons!
name
Focusgebieden Samengevat heeft elke organisatie 3 focusgebieden: Het vergroten van klantperspectief (WAT) Het vergroten van medewerkerperspectief
name
De Next-Level Democracy: wij zijn samen de overheidDit artikel kwam tot stand in co-creatie met Sjoerd Hania Er is een raar onderscheid in onze maatschappij:
name
Ken je dat gevoel, dat je naar een oude science fiction film zit te kijken? Dat je ruimtevaart vliegtuigen ziet waarvan je denkt; “Hoe is het mogelijk
name
De brug bouwen, terwijl je erover loopt, vraagt moed en vertrouwen Is het mogelijk om elkaar niet als concurrenten te zien? Om samen te gaan voor het
name
“Een slecht leider wordt door het volk veracht. Een goed leider wordt door het volk geprezen.Een groot leider is iemand waarbij het volk zegt: we hebben
name
“Een slecht leider wordt door het volk veracht. Een goed leider wordt door het volk geprezen.Een groot leider is iemand waarbij het volk zegt: we hebben
name
Je moet een dikke huid hebben als je in de politiek gaat, werd mij verteld. Vroeg of laat krijg je een frontale aanval voor de kiezen, of fungeer je publiekelijk
name
‘wanneer je focust op balans, krijg je balans en … sta je stil’ Balans vinden in je leven, in je werk en tussen privé én werk is een bijna vanzelfsprekende
name
Veel mensen die burn-out raken, lopen vast omdat ze niet passen in een bepaalde context. Soms heeft de mismatch zelfs betrekking op de hele gevestigde
name
Met verkiezingen weer in zicht komt de molen van beïnvloeding weer op gang. Waar laten wij ons door beïnvloeden? Wat zorgt ervoor welk hokje we op 2

DonateFacebookG+TwitterRSSLinkedInPaper.li

x

donatie

x

eBook